Nee!

Fatboy ' ' under the name of HEADDEMOCK has a hammock on the marktgebracht and has a registered Community design. Garden furniture and has a hammock GardenImpressions trades under the name ' ' OTTAWA op the market. According to Fatboy haarmodelrecht infringement, now the Ottawa makes the Ottawa at a different overall impression than her model. Doorovername of the copyrighted traits of the Headdemock, can not be regarded as a stand-alone work deOttowa according to Fatboy. The Fatboyingeroepen copyright protection has also only cover by opde hammock as such, the frame is disregarded. The hexagonal (dense) form with bredemaatvoering and a defined stitching pattern of the quilted fabric, zijn the attributes that would be inherited according to Fatboy.

Design law: regarding the band lined along the circumference excluded because the attribute moetdit the technical heeftvan reinforcement function. As far as wanting to argue that a technischkenmerk for protection has Fatboy is eligible if there are technical, yet that thesis incorrect alternatievenvoorhanden judged. Because the bottom has not involved the comparison, Fatboyin should be aangenomendat that side has no similar pattern. Also missing is the opvallenduitstekende plane and the anchorage rectangular instead of round. The Omdatbij model registration the excellent plane (the label) and the bevestigingspuntfeitelijk are the only distinguishing elements creates a anderealgemene impression and there is no modelrechtinbreuk.

Copyright: All possible copyright opbasis of the technical function traits are rejected. This subject: the basic form of the dehangmat band, the wide dimensions, lined (for multiple persons), dewattering (for comfort), the fabric choice (weatherproof) and the subheading inbanen (preventing wattering located on n place accumulates). The vorderingenworden rejected and condemned in the costs of the proceedings. Fatboy